Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night - Interstellar Review

At 9:30pm, I stumbled out of the cinema, having concluded a 3-hour journey in Interstellar's universe. I felt dazed, awestruck, and quite stunned. This is quite normal for me if the movie was good, or at least sufficiently thought-provoking.

It was when I was sitting quietly at a bench at 11:30pm, still dazed, still awestruck, still stunned, and with the movie's soul-tingling soundtrack still ringing in my head, did I fully accept that I had witnessed something quite spectacular.

Why Inception Is The Best Movie of All Time

"You're waiting for a train. A train that will take you far away. You know where you hope this train will take you, but you don't know for sure."

Looking back, I don't even remember what made me decide to watch Inception. Perhaps it was an online review, perhaps it was a friend's recommendation. What I do remember is finally having some time for myself one boring afternoon and the movie on my laptop (I never caught it while it was still in cinemas - one of my lifetime regrets). So I sat down and took a proverbial train ride, not knowing where it would take me.

That ride ended 2.5 hours later, and with it, my life had changed.

[SPOILERS AHEAD] [IT'S BEEN 4 FREAKING YEARS]

Okay? More Than Okay: The Fault in Our Stars Review

Big, neon-lit disclaimer upfront: I have not read the book.

This is one of my "going in blind" situations where I know nothing about the movie and have not attempted to do any sort of research beforehand. Therefore, as is the case with many other book-to-movie adaptations, my opinions may not reflect that of someone going in the cinema with a certain set of expectations.

Let's face it, though: by reading a book, any book, you've pretty much guaranteed your disappointment for its movie counterpart anyway. So there is that.

With that out of the way, on to the blockbuster that's been hyped up for months now.

And for those of you who follow me, it's good to be writing again.

Fire Meets Snow - The Hunger Games: Catching Fire Review

Words by Terence Wang
Additional writing by Siangling Tan

When the train carrying three Hunger Games victors and one poodle-like woman exited the tunnel to reveal a panoramic view of Panem, I felt certain that I was in for a treat. And I was right.

Taking place soon after the events in The Hunger Games, Catching Fire brings viewers behind the cameras and into the lives of Katniss and Peeta, victors of the earlier 74th Hunger Games. Without spoiling too much for people who haven't watched the series at all - honestly though, you should hitting Back, Close, Ctrl+W or whatever you fancy right now - they managed to break the tradition of one-winner-per-game in a spontaneous, last-minute move of desperation, but by doing so have forced the powerful hand of the secretive, authoritarian government led by President Snow (played by Jonathan Sutherland).

A little disclaimer beforehand: You can say I'm a fan of the novel trilogy. It was more accidental than anything else, really - a couple of years ago, I selected the first book at a lazy session in my local bookstore and started a read. Before I knew it, several hours had passed, I was walking out of the store in a mockingjay-induced daze and a desire to catch up with the rest of the series. As such, if you're not enamored by the books, you may want to take my review with a bit of salt, or take the comparison of the movie with its book counterpart out of the equation. On the other hand, if you, too, enjoyed the novels and the themes associated with them, then this overview will be for you.

REVIEW: A Dream PC

Me: “It’s here.”

Terence: “I want to congratulate you but all I can think of is ‘screw you’.”

Grace: “Yay! Pictures!”

Matt: “Photos please and do review it!”

As mentioned in the title, this will be a review of a custom PC currently taking up much of the desk in my  computer room. I received this computer as a birthday present from my dad and to a lesser extent, Terence, for he advised me A LOT on the specs of this rig. So let’s start with that.

The Vampire, The Witch, and the Werewolf

Poor Tim Burton. Described by NME as the “web’s favourite whipping boy”, sometimes things don’t go right for the man that clearly tries his best. His work, well-known for its quirkiness, is often subject to polarizing opinion from critics and movie-goers alike. Blockbuster hits like 1989’s Batman doesn’t save him from criticism for some of his less well-received work, like 2010’s Alice in Wonderland. (That said, the latter is still one of the top-grossing films of all time, so I suppose it counts for something.)


As such, it is with a mix of anticipation and curiosity in which one watches any new Tim Burton film. Even more so when you have Johnny Depp as the lead, in a three piece suit and Joker-like makeup. For me personally, it’s an even bigger departure from the usual, as this is the first movie that I’ve watched without knowing any background or reading any reviews beforehand. I was unarmed. And that made me vulnerable indeed.


So, Dark Shadows.

The Ant and The Boot

I’m going to start on a less relevant note – I’ve found a purpose for doing movie reviews.

In my last movie review, I contemplated whether there was any justification for me doing these reviews any more (see the link for info). Then a few neutrons in my brain connected together like in some baby milk commercial, and I happily found a use for them. They’re now officially writing practice. Yes, it’s a boring idea. Useful nonetheless.

I’m not the best person to review superhero movies. Being unfamiliar with the numerous headache-inducing comic versions and their respective storylines, characters and settings does little to help me get comfortable with the latest superhero blockbuster that Hollywood has to offer. 


Sure, the screenwriters know this fact quite well, and often adapt the movie well enough to the mainstream, non-comic-reading audience. But still, a curious soul like me is often unsatisfied with scratching the surface; he/she wants to dig further, like one would after viewing a movie from a trilogy, but this would be like breaking the wall of a reservoir; you’ll drown under the torrent of information.

Happily, you don’t with The Avengers.

Of Dystopia, Young Love and The Girl on Fire

If you know him well, you'll know that Haymitch is quite the reluctant trainer(or at least, he pretends to be). Always drunk and irresponsible, one wonders why he stays around to teach the new tributes year after year. He probably wonders himself too, except he does get his "refreshments".

Same for me, in a way. I wonder why I still do these movie reviews. They're not the main point of my blog, and not many people read them anyway. But, like Haymitch's alcohol, they're quite...satisfying.

Besides, who can not talk about this:

Spoilers ahead.

That Time of The Year Again (Christmas Special I)

I love Christmas.

Being a Malaysian, I've had the good fortune to experience many other festivals and celebrations besides my own. And, being a Chinese Malaysian, I get to celebrate two! Awesome.

However, I still, still feel that Christmas is still king, in terms of food, festive mood and overall celebration. The oft-mentioned Christmas mood is infectious, and I have no doubt my fellow Catholics will fell the same. No offense to other religions, races or cultures etc.

Sometimes, however, for some people, Christmas can be...quite a bit of a hassle.

Quite a few people will start moaning when it reaches this holiday season. The main reason? I bet you know: Gift-giving! The long, arduous process of thinking hard what to buy for your long distance nephew's cousin's daughter's uncle's son and hoping that it wouldn't get tossed into the trash can reserved for the "Worst Christmas Present Ever".

Take that, multiplied by about a hundred of uncles, aunts, granddads, grandmums, nephews, nieces, cousins, siblings, in-laws, and you're pretty much looking at very, very long weeks ahead.

Which brings me to...Arthur Christmas.

REVIEW: Buried; Law Abiding Citizen; The Tourist; Knight and Day; Toy Story 3

First off, I want to clear this up: Since I'm reviewing so many of these at once, I will not do a full review, only a short one. A gloss-over. Something like that.

Now, where's that disclaimer?


WARNING: This review contains spoilers. Please proceed only if you a)have watched the movie(s); b)don't intent to watch the movie(s) but want to know more about it/them; c) are going to watch it/them, but want to know its/their plot and storyline because of lack of impatience.
You have been WARNED.

 

 Buried

Paul Conroy(Ryan Reynolds) is a truck driver in Iraq, who is kidnapped by terrorists and... buried. In a coffin. The title rather suggests that, doesn't it?

Before we go on, just imagine being buried. In a coffin. Underground. With absolutely nobody around, and only a Blackberry, a Zippo(lighter) and a few other items. Got the idea? Good, let's carry on.

Naturally, Paul tries to do all he can to save himself, ex calling the FBI, his employers, his wife etc.

You have to watch the movie to find out what happened, but I'll tell you this: It is FANTASTIC.

Before I watched it, I was wondering how the director was going to fill in 1.5 hours by just filming Paul in a coffin. I mean, come on. What can he do that is remotely interesting? Sing?

However, saying that Rodrigo Cortés-the director- pulled it off would be just an understatement. This is easily my personal second-best movie of 2010. What he manages to with so little-fill your heart with worry and anxiety for the him(Paul), share his pain and loss of hope and make you gasp at some of the awful things Paul has to do at the demand at the terrorists.

A fantastic job, considering how the director managed to bring so much out of so little. (8/10)

Law Abiding Citizen

Click on the pic, and you'll see the question "How do you stop a killer who is already behind bars?"

Good question.

Wikipedia: "Clyde Shelton (Gerard Butler) saw the murder of his wife and daughter (right in front of him) at the hands of Clarence Darby (Christian Stolte) and his accomplice Rupert Ames (Josh Stewart). During their trial, prosecutor Nick Rice (Jamie Foxx) informs Clyde that DNA evidence incriminating Clarence has been deemed inadmissible due to botched forensics because, according to Nick, the actions of the police at the crime scene affected its solidity in court, and that Clyde's testimony alone is insufficient to prove either suspect's guilt. Nick, interested in maintaining his high conviction rate, strikes a deal: Clarence gives testimony that will send Rupert to death row, and in exchange Nick allows Clarence to plead guilty to third-degree murder, for which he will only serve a few years in prison. Knowing that Clarence was the actual killer, Clyde is left feeling betrayed by both Nick and the justice system."

Sorry for such a long paragraph, but I didn't find a good enough way to describe the beginning of the movie.

I think you can guess what's coming next; what happens when someone is left betrayed so badly? Why, he kills them all, of course.

First, he gets revenge on Rupert by switching the drugs for his death sentence to let him die a painful death. Clarence is suspected for this, but Clyde leads him away from the police... into his own hands. Ouch.

I would say that he proceeded to torture and cut him into (personal estimate)14378 pieces, but to keep this below 18+ rating...

The audience will be shocked when Clyde surrenders himself to the police. Even more when he demands a high quality mattress in return for a confession. A mattress, for heaven's sake.

Ah, but wait: Clyde is a master tactician.

I won't give out too much, but even the entire city has to be put on marshal law because of what he's doing. Even in jail.

However, I feel they have overdone it a bit in terms of action and violence. You know, the type that Hollywood feels is necessary to be put in every film they make?

Otherwise, though, a good watch, especially for those who love a well crafted plot/storyline. (7.5/10)

The Tourist

Ah, two big names from Hollywood together. Should be a hell of a film, yes? No?

Neither. Sadly, I might add.

Elise(Jolie) is a woman who is being trailed by Scotland Yard. She receives a letter from a former lover, Alexander Pearce(who has stolen 2 billion from a gangster and is wanted by the British government for tax evasion) telling her to board a train to Venice, pick a man who looks like him and make the cope think that it is him. She does so and picks Frank(Johny Depp, but you probably guessed this)

Interesting, isn't it? And the rest of the plot is actually quite interesting too.

Where it falls apart is the acting. It's obvious that Depp and Jolie don't bond well(although I like Jolie's lines). The pace of the movie is also too slow and cumbersome for an action film. The action itself is mediocre. It's like they want you to take a good long look at the beautiful scenery that they're shooting. A holiday commercial then? Perhaps.

It's sad, really, because the scenery is beautiful. The movie isn't. It's just average. And for a big film with two big stars and a big budget, it's not enough. (5/10)

Knight and Day

Yet two big names again. The difference is these two are nearer to their expiry day than the other two mentioned above. An even bigger recipe for disaster?

Not really.

June Havens(Diaz) is a woman going to her sister's wedding that happens to be in the wrong place, at the wrong time. To be more specific, the wrong plane and flight time. This is because she ends up with Roy Millers(Cruise), an agent on the run. Who has plenty of enemy agents(both from his former employers and outside gangsters) and after him. She must now stay with him, because if the enemy agents get her, she will be interrogated, tortured and possibly raped(ok I made that up). As Tom Cruise puts it, "If you're with me, your chances of survival(raises hand)-this high. Without me(lowers hand), this low. With me; without me. With me..."

Unlike the previous film, the actors here are pretty good. They are fun and humorous, especially Tom. This is because this film is pitted as an cool, funny and breezy-type action movie. Plot is ok.

What spoilt the movie for me was the unrealistic scenes. I understand that they want to make it funny, but showing Tom desperately hiding from the bullets, then just walk through the battlefield to walk over to Cameron? Cameron managing to drive a car unknown to her through a tunnel full of other motorists without a scratch? Really?

It's still an ok watch; just don't expect to care much about the storyline.(6.5/10)

Toy Story 3

Being the third and final of the series, one wonders whether the great Pixar will finally screw it up. I mean, just look at the movies destroyed by prequel; Terminator and Meet The Parents, anyone?

Guess what: They've done it again.

I'm to lazy to write the plot as my arm is already aching by now, so....

Wikipedia: "Andy is now 17 years old and packing for college, and his toys who have not been played with in years feel forgotten and abandoned. Andy decides to take Woody with him to college and intends to store the other toys in the attic. By accident, Andy's mom throws the other toys away, making them think they are no longer wanted; they escape and decide to climb in a box to be donated to the Sunnyside Daycare. Woody, the only toy who saw what really happened, is forced to follow the others and tries to explain they were thrown out by mistake, but they refuse to listen."

Woody leaves, but later finds out that the toys have been tricked. I'm stopping here, because any more would ruin it.

This movie represents everything that is good about Pixar: Awesome scenes and scenery, great and funny lines, themes that touch your heart, characters that you can relate to, and an ending that will make you cry. Literally.

It's my favourite movie of the year, and my favourite Pixar movie. And that's saying a lot. (10/10)

REVIEW: The Chronicles of Narnia - The Voyage of the Dawn Treader

WARNING: This review contains spoilers. Please proceed only if you a)have watched the movie; b)don't intent to watch the movie but want to know more about it; c) are going to watch it, but want to know its plot and storyline because of lack of impatience.
You have been WARNED.


Have I overused the "bolds" and "CAPITALS"? Never mind.

This is probably the first time I have watched a movie that has just been released. Seriously.

To make things easier for you readers, I shall break down this review into several sections.

Plot
This, unfortunately, is where the movie falls short.

If only they had just used the same formula that they used in The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe, that is, to faithfully follow C.S.Lewis's storyline, this section would have got high marks, as everyone knows that his work was brilliant. But no, the script writers had to put their heads together and say: "Let's toss it a little here...and turn it there..."

Result? A little underwhelming.

I entered the cinema late-no thanks to certain people-and missed a little of the beginning. At first, the movie seemed to be following the original plot. Then, I noticed a few changes that I won't mention here, just in case you are one of those who didn't see/follow my warning.

The real disappointments came later. When the crew reached Lone Islands, they defeat the slave bosses(which follows the plot), and after they saved one of the Lords(who is a poor prisoner here instead of the wealthy guy in the book), he hands them a "magical sword" which, as we find out later, together with the other swords from the other six Lords, must a great evil on Dark Island(which does exist) which will threaten Narnia with...something.

WHY??? Lewis doesn't even mention the swords in the book!(Ok, he did, but they were just the Lords' weapons) The plot was supposed to be about all of them  on a quest to the other side of the world which was where they believed Aslan's country was and the obstacles, fears and temptations they faced on the way.

If you haven't read the book, you have to. Now. Go get the car, bike, whatever and find a book shop.

This is the problem with movie producers and directors. They think that every movie has got to have a super villain that has to be killed in the name of humanity(or, in this care, 'animality'). Why can't it just be about each individual's fears?

However, I do think that the producers were clever in choosing the Dark Island part to be expanded, especially as it is about manipulating one's fears and thoughts. (I still feel that they shouldn't have made it something to be destroyed) They also expanded the part on Edmund's rivalry with Caspian, which was great.

All this 'expanding', however, creates a new problem: many details and long parts in the book have been cut short.

First it was on Lone Island. There was a whole sub-plot on how they devised a cunning plan to oust the Governor, but in the movie it isn't even mentioned.

We also have the part on Ramandu's island (Ramandu was the one who told them about the 'spell' that needed to be broken with the 7 swords) and several other parts that I can't remember cut short. Being a fan of the books, this makes the movie feel... stingy, in an odd way.

To give the script writers credit, the parts which followed the original were excellently done(you'll have to read the book to understand). If only they had decided to just leave the rest of the plot alone.

Special Effects

This is one of the best parts.

The scenery, sound effects, costumes and lighting and general "believable-ness" are beautiful and immaculately executed. One has to watch the movie to appreciate this, of course, but here are some, er, examples...

The Pevensies, Caspian and the "Blue Star".

Repicheep(right) and Eustace-turned-Dragon

The Dawn Treader.

The 3-D effects, while not groundbreaking or outstanding, do a very good job at enhancing the viewing experience. Should you pay extra for it? In my opinion, probably.

Characters

I just wish that the script writers were half as good as the actors.

Seriously, they are good. Georgie Henley(Lucy Pevensie) is as delightful as ever; you just can't help liking her.Skandar Keynes (Edmund Pevensie) is slightly boring at normal times, but does a great job at acting out his dark side. High praise goes to Will Poulter(Eustace Scrubb) for (together with the script writers, of course) managing to turn the people-love-to-hate character in the book into...people-love-to-hate-and-laugh-at. He talks in such a complicated manner that it's usually funny. Simon Pegg is also excellent and witty as voice of Reepicheep, although whether it surpasses Eddie Izzard from the second film(Prince Capian) is for you to decide.


Overall, although I'm a little underwhelmed with The Voyage of The Dawn Treader's storyline, the producers have done a fine job on the characters, their lines, the scenery and the effects.

Rating: 7.5


The Good: Characters, witty lines, scenery, special effects.
The Bad: Altered plot, some parts cut short.

Terence Wang wonders when the next Narnia  film will come out, and which book it will be based on.

Avatar

I know it's a little too late(not my fault), but I finally watched Avatar. In 3D.

As with all movies I watch, I will write a review on this, but first I want to comment on GSC's customer service.

This time, by far, was the most troublesome seat booking fo me. Ever. Since you could only watch 3D in Gurney Plaza (for the entire state of Penang-GSC's fault), I had no other choice but to try book a seat there.

Terence Wang calls GSC.

"Welcome to GSC's phone reservation. Please note that only limited seats are made available for phone reservation. More seats are made available-(Terence)Yes, yes, come on- through our online ticket purchase and at the respective cinema box office counters. For Gurney Plaza, press 1. For... (presses 1). Percy Jackson and the Lightning Thief. Press 1. 72 Tenants of Prosperity. Press 2...3...4...5... For international movies, press 6. For more English movies, press 7. (presses 7) Valentine's Day. Press 1. Avatar(3D)-(Terence)Finally-Press 2. (presses 2) Sorry. No show time is available in our system. Please try again later. Terence:" What the *'beep'.

I went through that for several weeks. How could that stupid *'beep' answering machine tell me there was no show time in their *'beep' system when they have an option for Avatar?!

I had no other choice, so I opted for online booking.

Have you booked a seat via GSC's website? If you  have, you know how awful it is. If you don't, never, unless:

i) You have a super fast internet connection.

ii) You are absolutely desparate.

Here's what will happen to you: You will have to wait 20-30 minutes for the page to load. Every page. Mutiply that by all the pages you need to visit, and you get 2-3 hours of waiting. More often then not, you won't get there at all. And when you get there. it's usually sold out.

It disrupted all the plans I had to watch it until Feb 16, when I was really desparate and used ticket purchase instead of booking.

Summary? It's terrible.

But now the movie.

I spent quite a big sum on the movie, and it was worth every sen. Period. The CGI, the setting, the action, it was mostly good.

The Good

Firstly, no other movie has ever made an alien environment look so real. No, not even Star Wars. As Jake rides in that bird passing over the forest, not once you will think it's fake. You will sit there, in your uncomfortable seat, eyes glued to the screen, (maybe) saliva drooling down your mouth.

Secondly, the technology used. Now, James Cameron filmed Avatar for around 10 years. But, all the robots, helicopters and special effects used are perfectly up-to-date and sometimes even better than some other movies. How does he do it? Unknown.

Finally, the battle. That was, undeniably, the highlight of the show. All the talking and learning earlier on blasts wide open to a full on attack. It's so good, I can't describe it. Here's an idea(though still not good enough to describe it):

The Bad

The one complaint I have of Avatar is the 3D glasses. They gave the effect all right, but they made the screen slightly blur. Some 3D effects also didn't work properly. I believe that this problem is local, because reviews from other countries gave great comments about it and did not mention this problem. Dolby take note.

Secondly, the plot. As you walk out of a cinema, you realize that the story was actually quite simple. Human attacks, sends marine undercover, marine turns on them, both races fight, human loses. But then again, this simple plot helps you to follow it better.

A final point I would like to add is that somehow you get the feeling that the film wasn't composed together that well and could have been shorter, at least for the front part.

Summary

8 out of 10. If there was no problem with the glasses it would be 9. Honestly, Avatar is great. It might not be as memorable as Titanic, or as action-packed as Terminator 2, and it isn't Cameron's best effort, but it's still a really good movie. If you still haven't watched it, go. It's still on.

But avoid the online booking. If possible.

Terence Wang wants GSC to improve thier service with 'drastic measures'.

*Censored

Disclaimer: This article is a movie review and does not intend to insult or offend anyone, not even GSC.

2012

As some of you might have guessed after reading the title (unless you didn’t read it which proves you’re an idiot), I am now talking about disaster movies. So if you have been watching Hannah Montana or Twilight you have to get out of here. Now. I’m serious, get out. For after my first review of New Moon you will be accusing me of being biased and you will be reporting me to the Home Ministry for sedition.


They’re out? Good riddance.

Anyway, back to disaster movies. Some that are working in the film industry (I’m assuming most of you are not) realize that making a disaster movie is actually, a big risk. It requires lots of special effects, lots of acting, and ultimately, lots of money. And at the end, you have to make sure the plot is really good or the movie will be, well, a disaster.

One good example is “The Day The Earth Stood Still’. You haven’t watched it? Don’t. Because that film is predictable, has a horrible plot, and has no feeling. In other words, a real disaster movie. So don’t watch it. Unless you want to watch a disaster movie. I mean literally. Or not. (Hits head) This is confusing. But you know what I mean, right?

So, that movie was bad. Oh, the planes are going to be shot down… yes they’re down. And look, the people are just running around with no sense of direction! And the entire Washington D.C. is still intact! And about the Earth standing still, oh yes it did…. For the last 10 seconds of the movie.

But let’s look on the bright side, they’re not all bad. For example, ‘The Day After Tomorrow’. Now that was a good movie. How do I know? Well, I watched it quite a few years ago, and I can’t forget it. Not many movies do that to me.

However, after that, there really weren’t any good disaster movies that I could remember at all. In fact, the whole industry went downwards with the economy, producing things like…New Moon. Ugh.

But now, I’m happy to say, a good movie is back. 2012. It might be a little fake at times, but it has two things that many disaster movies lacked: Feeling, humour and a good plot. Ok, that’s three. Some people can’t count well, alright?

But I feel that the thing that made this movie stand out was the humour. I mean, quite a few movies had a good plot and feeling, but you can’t find many with all three. Like:

“I can’t start the engine!”

“What do you mean?!!”

“Oh no…”

“Everyone shut up! (Pauses) Engine on. (Bentley engine starts up-looks at driver) “Voice control.”

“Oh.”

You might not really get it here, so watch the film. If you have, you know what I mean.

I know some of those New Moon fans did not listen to my advice and have kept on reading, and are now saying that 2012 is special effects and nothing else. Well, I have only one thing to say: read my disclaimer and walk away.

Now.


Terence Wang challenges those who think they can counter his opinion to comment below, and those who agree with him to also comment.


Disclaimer: As mentioned above, this article is for certain audiences only. The writer does not take responsibility for anything deemed offensive or insulting in this article.

New Moon

A blood-sucker. A meat eater. An idiot. Combine the three and you get: New Moon.


Anyone with the right mind knows that a real vampire(or werewolf) movie has lots of blood. And gore. And chill. Anyone with the right mind also knows that girls hate vampires. And werewolves. That makes one think: Why are 99% of the readers and watchers of New Moon, girls?

There can be only ONE thing: This is NOT a real vampire/werewolf/idiot movie.

Or wait, it could be a idiot movie.

To be honest, I haven't watched New Moon. But I have watched trailers. Ads. Sneak peeks. Reviews. And it has not changed my opinion. At all. In fact, it may have reinforced it.

Before all the girl fans of NM start throwing rotten eggs, let me quote a New Moon review, ok: "This movie is filled with bad dialogue and the guys taking off their shirts at every possible scene." There. And he rated it 1 star, if you wanted to know.

Trust me on this. Every book/movie/band/singer that has 99% girl fans almost certainly is because there are handsome men/boys. As it is in New Moon. And the Jonas Brothers. Etcetra. Etcetra. (I hope I spelt that right)

So to the boys whose girlfriends are pestering them to take them to watch New Moon, you have been warned. Unless of course you are prepared to take a nap. And let your girlfriend ditch you. No? You know what to do.